The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation (501425) Q4 02/03 earnings summary
Event summary combining transcript, slides, and related documents.
Q4 02/03 earnings summary
22 Oct, 2026Executive summary
FY ended 31 Mar 2003 returned to profit: PBT Rs 229.55 lakh vs loss of Rs 1,279.14 lakh in the prior 18-month period; periods are not comparable.
Gross profit before depreciation was Rs 632.87 lakh vs a loss of Rs 612.33 lakh; PAT was Rs 219.56 lakh and a 10% dividend (Rs 1/share) was recommended.
Results improved through higher-value marketing, exports, outsourcing, cost reduction, operating efficiencies and a favourable tea crop, despite continued weakness in tea and coffee prices.
Financial highlights
Gross income was Rs 13,530.07 lakh vs Rs 17,521.11 lakh in the prior 18-month period; net sales were Rs 11,507.05 lakh vs Rs 14,667.23 lakh.
Basic and diluted EPS was Rs 1.54 vs a loss of Rs 8.72 in the prior 18-month period; weighted average shares were 1,39,54,380.
Consolidated net sales were Rs 16,744.44 lakh; consolidated PAT after minority interest was Rs 255.39 lakh and EPS was Rs 1.83.
Outlook and guidance
Tea plans for FY 2003-04 included added non-reconditioned tea capacity, a stronger product mix and more direct sales to consuming centres to improve realisation.
Speciality tea exports were expected to grow; pricing remained exposed to Iraq-related uncertainty, the stronger rupee and currency movements in other tea-producing countries.
Spring operations planned a new Aurangabad plant and expansion into two-wheeler suspension springs, targeting market share growth from below 1% to 8%.
Coffee prices were expected to rise no more than 10%-12% from stated current levels; the outlook depended heavily on Brazil’s 2003/04 crop.
Latest events from The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation
- Higher profit, softer sales and negative operating cash flow defined FY 1996-97.501425
Q4 96/97 - Profit rose on stronger plantation realisations; new manufacturing lines launched.501425
Q4 97/98 - Labor disruption and particle-board losses drove a steep FY99 profit decline.501425
Q4 98/99 - Labour disruption, cost inflation and tea-price pressure drove a sharp loss.501425
Q4 99/00 - Commodity-price pressure and estate disruptions drove another loss; the dividend was skipped.501425
Q4 01/02 - Profit rebounded as lower financing costs and industrial gains offset plantation pressures.501425
Q4 03/04 - Higher profits and associate earnings met drought, cost and currency pressures.501425
Q4 04/05 - FY06 profit rose amid cost pressure, with expansion and healthcare poised to drive growth.501425
Q4 05/06 - Standalone earnings improved; acquisitions and new capacity set up growth, with VRS costs deferred to FY08.501425
Q4 06/07