Quartr AI chat

Spot the three adjectives describing demand that recur in the last 4 calls. (e.g., 'robust', 'resilient') for @Company. Did any of them swap to a softer or stronger synonym this quarter? If so, extrapolate the read-through.

What's changed in @Company's tone, KPIs, or guidance since the last earnings? Synthesize the deltas.

Pull the last four shareholder letters or words from the CEO from @Company. Identify shifts in tone, capital priorities, or strategic direction.

What were the most recurring themes in analyst questions during @Company's last two earnings calls? Highlight key areas of focus and concern.

List forward-looking statements for @Company in a table from recent transcripts and filings that reference expected progress or results in the upcoming earnings release.

Identify any guidance language in @Company's transcripts or filings that signals continuity or subtle adjustment (e.g., 'on track,' 'ahead of plan,' 'sequential improvement'). What can be inferred about internal confidence for the next earnings release?

Was anything said that contradicts, adds color or context, or in any other way deviates from what was said in the last earnings event? Analyze and compare the two events.

I'm meeting with @Company management. Prepare 3 long-term strategic questions, 3 near-term execution questions, and 3 tough, short-biased "bad cop" questions.

Summarize the core business model of @Company in simple terms. What does it sell, who are its customers, and how does it make money?

Evaluate whether @Company's main product or service is mission-critical or discretionary for its customers. How dependent are customers on it?

Does @Company have a durable competitive advantage? Identify evidence of brand strength, network effects, switching costs, or economies of scale.

Generate a bullet-point bull vs bear case on @Company, citing only the last four transcripts and filings.

Across @Watchlist, identify which companies have materially changed their demand language over the last two earnings calls.

Scan recent transcripts for shifts in guidance confidence in @Watchlist ("high visibility," "comfortable," "monitoring closely"). Rank companies by improving vs deteriorating confidence.

Identify companies in @Watchlist where recurring analyst questions are being answered with less specificity than in prior calls. Summarize what management may be trying to de-emphasize.

Compare how companies in @Watchlist are talking about demand and customer behavior this quarter versus last. Highlight where management appears more defensive or more assertive.

Identify which companies in @Watchlist have begun talking about normalization or inflection (orders, backlog, demand, utilization) while others remain cautious.

Identify any company in @Watchlist that has introduced new KPIs or removed existing ones from decks or prepared remarks. Assess whether this reflects changing priorities or an attempt to hide weakening performance.

Scan transcripts in @Watchlist for fading specificity. Identify companies where numeric ranges, timelines, or concrete examples have disappeared across quarters.

Compare how companies in @Watchlist talk about the same end markets and demand.

Assess which companies in @Watchlist were most positive and most negative in tone during the latest earnings season. Rank by changes in language, confidence, and forward-looking commentary rather than headline results.

List revenue and EBIT year-over-year growth for companies in @Watchlist for the last quarter and assess the main drivers.

Scan transcripts in @Watchlist where the most recent earnings introduced new risks or uncertainties not previously emphasized (execution issues, demand visibility, cost pressure).

Across @Watchlist, identify companies where capex intensity is peaking or rolling over, based on management's language around "peak investment," "harvest phase," or "leveraging prior spend." Assess margin and cash flow implications.

Scan transcripts in @Watchlist that demonstrate pricing discipline ("we don't compete on price," "value-based pricing," "walk-away discipline") versus those signaling reliance on discounts or volume concessions to sustain growth.

Assess how companies in @Watchlist talk about operating simplicity (fewer SKUs, focused customer cohorts, streamlined product lines, disciplined end-markets) versus adding complexity to chase marginal demand.

Scan transcripts in @Watchlist for precision in language. Highlight clear, specific statements tied to decisions and economics versus abstract or promotional phrasing.

Assess how management explains negative outcomes across @Watchlist. Identify honesty and clarity ('we misjudged X') versus vague or deflective explanations ('challenging environment').

Critically evaluate this analysis for @Company. Stress-test the core assumptions and inputs. Point out anything that seems off and anything that supports the conclusion.

Identify statements from @Company's management (calls, filings, decks) that directly contradict the claims and assumptions in this analysis. Quote the relevant passages and explain why they conflict.

Review my model for @Company and provide line-by-line feedback on key assumptions, highlighting strengths, risks, and potential blind spots.

Identify the single most questionable assumption in my research report for @Company and explain why.

Interrogate this earnings preview for @Company and compare results against expectations. Identify where actuals deviated, line by line.

Compare the confidence and tone of the earnings preview with management's actual commentary. Highlight where expectations were overstated or understated relative to company language.

Rewrite this research report as an updated version, incorporating the latest disclosures from @Company (earnings calls, filings, decks). Highlight what changes, what still holds, and how the conclusion should evolve.

Compare the core narrative in the earnings preview for @Company with management’s explanation of results. Identify where the narrative held versus where it broke.

Summarize the key conclusions of this industry report and map the implications for @Watchlist.

Identify questions this research report is likely to generate in upcoming investor conversations for @Company.

Identify where this report's conclusions align or conflict with recent management commentary for @Company.

Review this research report for @Company and generate five high-impact questions to ask management.