HeidelbergCement India (500292) Q4 2009 earnings summary
Event summary combining transcript, slides, and related documents.
Q4 2009 earnings summary
16 Oct, 2026Executive summary
FY2009 cement sales reached 2.66 million tonnes vs 2.42 million tonnes in FY2008; gross sales rose 17.42% to Rs. 104,023.92 lacs and net profit to Rs. 13,403.91 lacs.
Comparisons with FY2008 are not strictly like-for-like: prior-year results included the merged businesses only from April to December 2008.
Financial highlights
Gross sales were Rs. 104,023.92 lacs vs Rs. 88,697.67 lacs; net sales were Rs. 93,639.29 lacs vs Rs. 76,129.61 lacs in FY2008.
Net profit was Rs. 13,403.91 lacs vs Rs. 12,552.64 lacs; profit before tax from continuing operations was Rs. 17,474.87 lacs vs Rs. 10,672.62 lacs.
Operating surplus was Rs. 20,495.46 lacs vs Rs. 13,310.34 lacs; reported finance charges were Rs. 439.90 lacs and depreciation/amortization Rs. 2,580.69 lacs.
Other income included Rs. 1,175.62 lacs from certified emission rights; the FY2008 result included Rs. 90.25 lacs profit from discontinued operations.
Outlook and guidance
Cement demand was expected to remain firm in H1 2010, supported by housing and infrastructure; demand had improved at the start of Q1 2010, particularly in northern, western and central India.
Commercial production from the Damoh and Jhansi expansion projects was expected in Q1 2012; completion was projected to double total cement capacity to 6 MTPA.
Industry capacity was projected to reach 250–265 MTPA by end-2010, with expected annual industry growth of 9–10%; added capacity could pressure prices and utilization.
Latest events from HeidelbergCement India
- Weak cement pricing and higher interest drove a Rs 41.84 crore loss.500292
Q4 97/98 - Q4 returned to profit as restructuring and recovering cement demand offered relief from a loss-making year.500292
Q4 00/01 - Depressed pricing drove losses, while early demand recovery improved the outlook.500292
Q4 98/99 - Falling cement sales and rising costs drove a Rs. 13.78 cr net loss.500292
Q4 96/97 - Higher volumes could not offset weak cement realisations and heavy financing costs.500292
Q4 99/00 - Record cement output and 99% utilization could not offset falling prices and a deeper loss.500292
Q4 02/03 - 95% utilization amid losses; sponge iron and cement-price recovery offered a path to improvement.500292
Q4 03/04 - Lower finance costs narrowed losses, but liquidity and cement oversupply remained major constraints.500292
Q4 01/02 - Record cement despatches and a narrower loss came amid eroded net worth and tight liquidity.500292
Q4 04/05