Logotype for Intellego Technologies

Intellego Technologies (INT) Investor update summary

Event summary combining transcript, slides, and related documents.

Logotype for Intellego Technologies

Investor update summary

2 Feb, 2026

Background and investigation

  • Following the arrest of the former CEO for gross fraud in November 2025, trading was halted, an interim CEO was appointed, and SEK 100 million was seized.

  • KPMG was engaged to conduct an independent forensic investigation into financial reporting and market communication for 2025, analyzing over 600 GB of data, including accounting records, emails, and interviews.

  • The investigation focused on SEK 640 million of reported revenue from eight large purchase orders, covering Q1–Q3 2025 and the period 1 January–31 October 2025.

  • The scope covered only 2025 transactions for Intellego Technologies AB, with an expanded review of earlier years ongoing.

  • Nasdaq raised concerns about transparency, revenue recognition, and communication, prompting a regulatory review.

Key findings and conclusions

  • SEK 640 million in reported revenue for 2025 was materially incorrect, misleading, and should not have been recognized.

  • No evidence was found of actual collaboration, binding agreements, or product deliveries for the eight major purchase orders; only MoveoMed called off a minor delivery, which was not fulfilled.

  • Partnerships with customers were forward-looking and represented potential future revenue, not current sales.

  • Nearly 99% of reported revenue from January to September 2025 originated from these questionable purchase orders.

  • Communicated financial information, including quarterly reports and press releases, was materially misleading.

Identified activities and irregularities

  • Multiple versions of the eight purchase orders were produced: one set for customer negotiations and another, altered version for invoicing and revenue recognition.

  • Altered versions of purchase orders were provided to the accounting firm, omitting critical terms to justify revenue recognition.

  • The former CEO was solely responsible for instructing the accounting firm, manipulating documents, and using large purchase orders to influence market perception and attract investors.

  • Invoices were created in the accounting system but sent only to the CEO, not customers; customers were unaware of the orders.

  • Purchase orders were open-ended, unsigned, or lacked binding obligations, making revenue recognition unjustified.

Partial view of Summaries dataset, powered by Quartr API
AI can get things wrong. Verify important information.
All investor relations material. One API.
Learn more